Berichten over performance

Jij

15 juni 2009

Donderdag 25/06/2009 om 16.30 in de Grote Zaal van het Akademietheater van de HKU op Janskerkhof 18 te Utrecht. In deze lecture performance presenteer ik mijn afstudeeronderzoek naar relaties in transdisciplinaire maakprocessen.

Jij
Een dialoog in de vorm van een monoloog.

Voor jou, van mij. Een lecture performance over actoren, netwerken, conceptmapping, transdisciplinaire maakprocessen, theaterwetenschap, nieuwe media en digitale cultuur, translatie en vertaling, relaties en jij (of jou, wat jij wilt).

Jochem Naafs

Introduction to Beginning, Middle, End

23 april 2009

This is an introduction I was asked to make for the performance Beginning, Middle, End by Andrea Bozic, Julia Willms, Madalina Dan and Michael Pinchbeck. In November 2008 Michael asked me as a dramaturge for his part of a performance: End. End was only to be one third of the whole performance and while reading the proposal that was send to Springdance I wondered how I could ever be a dramaturge for only this part…

After last year’s Dialogue (this years Europe in Motion) Springdance commissioned for a collaboration by three former participants from three different countries to make a performance for this year’s festival.
Andrea, Madalina and Michael decided to propose a performance, which would both allow collaboration and autonomy. The title of this performance, Beginning, Middle, End, refers both to the structure and concept of the work and to the structure of the working process.

The working process of six weeks was preceded by virtual contact in which the idea was worked out. There were three periods with actual contact: 4 days in March (beginning), 4 days in April (middle) and 4 days in this week (end). In these week they were showing each other what they have been working on and figuring out how these three parts fit together to form one performance. The remaining time each maker worked on his or her own part. But they kept looking to each other’s parts, via skype and live. This looking played an important part in the process.
The three parts were allocated alphabetically: Andrea Bozic asked her long time collaborator Julia Willms to work together to make Beginning, Madalina Dan worked on Middle and Michael Pinchbeck worked on End.

So this performance started out of 3 words, both as form and content: beginning, middle and end. The question is what it means to have such a structure for both the making process and the performance you’ll see tonight. Next to collaboration and autonomy this structure also provided content. What is beginning? What is ending? What is it like to be in the middle? And how do a beginning, a middle and an end relate and interact?

In the end this last question is perhaps the question I was thinking of as a problem in the beginning while reading the proposal. Now I would rather see it as a challenging idea to work from rather then a question that needs to be answered. I would like to end my introduction with the following quote, which can be seen as a starting point for this collaboration:

Every moment has a beginning, middle and end, then dialogue will have meaning.
(http://www.abwag.com/beginning_middle_end.htm)

I wish you a pleasant performance.

An artist and his review

23 april 2009

My press kit inside the artist goodie-bag I got yesterday seems to represent my split personality during Springdance. On the one hand I am being the objective journalist, writing my columns about the programme, atmosphere and side programme. On the other hand I am the dramaturge for Michael Pinchbeck’s End. Considered an artist, at least according to the batch I received with my goodie-bag, I morphed into another person in a split second. And is it not the task of the artist to present a subjective perspective on this world?

Of course two issues come to mind straight away. Can I be objective whilst being commissioned by Springdance to write about Springdance? How can I be critical about my own commissioner? The other issue is the question what it is to be a dramaturge. Does my subjective view matter for the artist I am working with? Or should I be able to objectify my own perspective on the performance. Should I try to represent the audience that will come and see the show?
In the end I prefer to mix up a clear subjective view with some elements, which I think are more objective. I try to use this approach in my writing, my research and my dramaturgical practice. Alternating in describing the subject matter and my own position in relation to that.

I can’t help thinking of Simon Ellis’s Down (working title). Ellis, one of the participants in Europe in Motion, not only presented his solo performance, he also provided the context of this performance. From the introduction, where I imagined myself in his place, having just introduced Beginning Middle, End myself an hour earlier, to the reviews, audience reactions and even the specifications for touring.

As an artist Ellis took the liberty to be lecturer, choreographer, dancer, critic, audience and PR assistant in one. Criticising both dance and the dance community, he shows, as the devil’s advocate, the ‘like knows like’ existence of this dance community. He left his audience powerless. Everything was already said. Interesting enough Ellis manages to represent several of my positions during Springdance & performance festival. And by doing this he got me thinking about my position(s) in this community.

In a way Ellis covers himself against any criticism from others, wrapping his entire performance. I could write a review on Beginning, Middle, End today…

Beginning, Middle, End by Andrea Bozic, Julia Willms, Madalina Dan and Michael Pinchbeck tonight (April 23), 19.00h in Theater Kikker.
More Europe in Motion: April 23 and 24, 20.30h in Theater Kikker.

Beginning, Middle, End

7 april 2009

Currently I am working with Michael Pinchbeck, a Nottingham based writer, live artist and performance artist. Together with Andrea Bozic and Madalina Dan he makes the performance Beginning, Middle, End. The startingpoint is that every artist takes one part. Andrea takes Beginning together with Julia Willms, Madalina takes Middle and Michael takes End. Michael asked me for dramaturgical advise for his part. The performance will première at Springdance on April 22 and will also play on the 23rd.
For more information visit their blog.

Beginning, Middle, End - Andrea Bozic / Madalina Dan / Michael Pinchbeck
Three artists meet for the first time. They make a performance about the beginning, the middle and the end of an encounter. This is the beginning.

Andrea takes the beginning, Madalina takes the middle and Michael takes the end. The beginning is about a beginning, the middle is about a middle and the end is about an end. This is the middle.
They play with threes. Three dances. Three artists. Three countries. Three bears. Three ways to tell a story or to sing a song. Three in One. They make three entrances and three exits. This is the end.

Andrea Bozic (HR/NL), Madalina Dan (ROU) and Michael Pinchbeck (UK) took part in Springdance Dialogue 2008. They proposed Beginning Middle End for Springdance 2009 to enable both a collaboration and an important sense of autonomy. They identified many intersections in their work; shared interests in absence and presence; issues of embodiment and self-referentiality; fictionalising personal life and personalising fictional life. Beginning Middle End has been built around the artists’ presence and absence in each other’s creative processes. Interested in the connections between their practices and the space between their practices, the artists asked how they might inhabit each other’s work and exit their own.

Production credits:
Concept and performance: Andrea Bozic, Madalina Dan, Michael Pinchbeck
Live drawing (Beginning): Julia Willms
Dramaturgical advice (End): Jochem Naafs
Produced by the Springdance Festival (in co-production with Theater Frascati), financially supported by the Europe in Motion project.

Springdance Stage

31 maart 2009


For this years dance and performance festival Springdance launched a community website. Please join Springdance Stage and get in contact with dancers, choreographers, makers, journalists, other visitors et cetera. I will keep all visitors of Springdance (Stage) up to date with a number of columns I will write before, during and after the festival. But the website also features videos, pictures and reviews from both makers and visitors. And you are welcome to share your own expectations and experiences too.

Visit http://springdance.ning.com/ and join by hitting the sign up button!

The Post Show Party Show

1 december 2008

December 5th and 6th The Post Show Party Show is coming to Amsterdam. Ivana Müller invited Michael Pinchbeck on behalf of Frascati to perform it as ’supporting programme’ of her performance Playing Ensemble Again and Again. He was one of the participants of Springdance Dialogue last April. This performance was shown there and the intriguing combination of re-enacting the past and being in the here and now hit me. Pinchbeck seems to have found a fascinating way in which the past and the present get mixed up and reinvented. Here are two quotes from the text I wrote for Springdance:

“At the start of The Post Show Party Show, every spectator is offered a drink. In this performance, Michael Pinchbeck very clearly plays with the here and now. He mentions his own presence and his father’s as actors, as well as the audience’s presence. He combines this layer in the performance with an attempt at re-enacting The Sound of Music and the post show party after the amateur performance of the musical in which his parents met in 1970″.

“Memory, nostalgia and the personal play an important role in Pinchbeck’s work. In The Long and Winding road and Sit with me for a moment and remember, he invites the audience to accompany him in a car or on a bench for a one-to-one performance. If they ask, he talks with his visitor about his reasons for inviting them to join him. In The Post Show Party Show, Michael Pinchbeck returns to the past once more. In these performances, he does not tell a story about himself or voice his opinion about a subject. He tries to recount what has happened and how he relates to these events: always looking for what is left behind to see what is lost”.

The Post Show Part Show - Michael Pinchbeck
December 5 and 6: 19.30 in Frascati2
December 6: 18.45 Pinchbeck discusses his work with dramaturge Jeroen Fabius

Playing Ensemble Again and Again - Ivana Müller
December 3/6: 21.00 in Frascati1

Orbis Pictus - Theatrum Mundi

14 oktober 2008

Van 23 t/m 26 oktober vind in Amsterdam de conferentie Orbis Pictus- Theatrum Mundi plaats. Deze conferentie wordt georganiseerd door het Gesellschaft für Theaterwissenschaft en heeft dit jaar als thema de combinatie van de wereld als podium en de zichtbare wereld. De vraag die gesteld wordt is hoe het theater de wereld waarin wij leven zou kunnen verbeelden.

De conferentie is opgdeeld in vier secties: paradigma verschuivingen, methoden, esthetiek en politiek. Naast lezingen en discussies zijn er in Frascati ook diverse voorstellingen en installaties te zien:

De installatie Anamorphose van Ibrahim Quraisi, Nothing can surprise us van Andrea Bozic en Julia Willms, Little red (play): herstory van het internationale gezelschap andcompany&Co en The art of flipbook (Daumenkinographie) van Volker Gerling.

Ursus Ludens

23 september 2008

(Geschreven voor summerschool kunstkritiek, Het Theaterfestival Antwerpen, VTI)

Hotel ModernRococo
Antwerpen, Bourla, 22 augustus 2008

Een georganiseerde chaos: dozen, bubbeltjesplastic, allerlei objecten en twee stille figuren met berenmaskers uitgestald op een wit plastic zeil. Het publiek komt binnen en is gedwongen over het knallende bubbeltjesplastic naar zijn plek te lopen. Het geluid hiervan is nog maar net uitgedoofd als er leven in een van de beren komt. Liggend op een trolley rolt de beer naar voren. Het voorzichtige geknal van het publiek maakt plaats voor het geratel van een mitrailleur: het spelen is begonnen.
Lees meer »

Just another day at the office?

2 juni 2008

It is almost impossible to write about Rimini Protokoll’s Call Cutta in a Box without speaking about my personal life. I will try though, because talking about my personal life to strangers isn’t something I usually do.
After entering my office in Brussels at four o’clock in the afternoon on Sunday May 27, I felt a little awkward. I was expecting a phone call from India that day so I couldn’t really get myself into doing my office job. I was staring out of the window and noticed that someone made a painting of Gaston Lagaffe (Guust Flater) throwing a rock on an innocent pedestrian, on the wall facing my office window.
Lees meer »

Verslag Springdance Dialogue 2008

24 mei 2008

Een poging tot verwoorden en interpreteren van
lichamen, bewegingen, woorden en beelden
(verslag geschreven in opdracht van Springdance, mei 2008)
(For an English version scroll down, no summary available)

Samenvatting
Twaalf deelnemers uit drie landen zijn door curator Gabriel Smeets gevraagd om aan de hand van de thema’s positie en context zichzelf en hun werk te presenteren in een vijfdaagse dialoog. De vragen die Springdance hen stelde daagde hen uit om in te gaan op de vragen en uitgangspunten aan de hand waarvan ze werken, de positie die ze zichzelf toewijzen en de context waarin ze werken.
Dit verslag vat de dialoog samen in vijf thema’s. ‘Het hier en nu van theater’, ‘Materiaal: persoonlijk en samples’, ‘Auteurschap en samenwerken’, ‘Lichaam en beweging’ en uiteraard ‘Context en positie’. Een selectie van citaten binnen deze thema’s verhelderen de onderwerpen en problemen die ter sprake zijn gekomen. De citaten van de ene maker koppel ik aan de ideeën van de ander, deze aanpak kan de relaties tussen de makers verduidelijken en op die manier ingaan op overeenkomsten en verschillen.
Lees meer »